Sunday, December 29, 2019

American Oil Dependence Essay - 1667 Words

American Oil Dependence Since the oil embargo of 1977, there has been an increased awareness of our nations energy security. As global population and energy consumption rise, the need for a stable energy supply has become a hot topic and a politically volatile issue. As our negative trade balance grows larger by the day, the United States finds itself in a rather precarious position. We are becoming more and more dependent on Middle East oil. Indeed, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) predicts that domestic petroleum consumption will increase to 60 Btu by the year 2025. This statistic, in and of itself, is a matter of concern with respect to the greenhouse gas emissions that result from petroleum combustion. However,†¦show more content†¦al., 1998). Once this occurs, oil production will decrease until it is no longer economically feasible to extract remaining reserves. Why then, is there virtually no interest in promoting alternative fuel technology? It is inevitable that at some point, sooner or later, we will not be able to make use of petroleum as a major fuel. The American public, as a whole, doesnt seem to be too concerned with this. Even the government fails to recognize the precarious nature of our energy future. Our own Department of Energy envisions a steady rise in oil, coal, and natural gas consumption for the next 25 years. The same graph shows only a nominal increase in the use of renewable energy technology and a flat-lining of hydroelectric energy generation. There are several reasons why alternative energy is slow to catch on in our nation. One of the most compelling reasons is the unreasonably low cost of fossil. The government reaches this goal by widespread subsidies of certain industries. The oil industry alone is a recipient of around $8 billion in annual subsidies (Env. Adv. Stat., 2003). This makes the use of crude oil derivatives like gasoline and heating oil much more appealing than other, more expensive fuels. More interesting, is the effect that government subsidizing has on theShow MoreRelatedThe Exploration Of The Keystone Pipeline989 Words   |  4 PagesKeystone Pipeline already exists and runs from â€Å"oil sand fields in Alberta, Canada into the US, ending in Cushing, Oklahoma† (What is the Keystone XL Pipeline?). The current topic concerning this pipeline is the expansion of the pipeline to create the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will consist of â€Å"1,700 new miles of pipeline† (What is the Keysto ne XL Pipeline?). This project would offer expansion from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast of Texas, â€Å"where oil refineries abound†, and expansion from AlbertaRead MoreOffshore Oil Drilling On The Environment1474 Words   |  6 PagesOffshore Oil Drilling â€Å"If we do nothing, it doesn t matter how we feel. And that’s exactly what oil companies are banking on: out of sight, out of mind† (Hart, 24). Petroleum is a naturally occurring oil found under deep layers of rock (â€Å"oil drilling†). Oil drilling is when a pipe penetrates through these several layers of rock in order to reach the petroleum oil underneath. This oil can then be purified or turned into gasoline for energy use. Offshore oil drilling, like its’ name describes, isRead MoreAddicted to Oil1208 Words   |  5 PagesAddicted To Oil The United States uses nearly a quarter of the world’s oil. This would not be a problem if the U.S. had a large oil reserve but it only has 3% of the world’s reserves for 4% of the population (Pickens). This huge dependence on oil is costing us economically and also threatens our dreams. The United States needs to become more energy independent by using sources other than oil. Many alternative sources are available but renewable sources provide the brightest future. Read MoreState Department Decision On Keystone Xl Pipeline1533 Words   |  7 Pages664-mile extension to an existing pipeline system built by Canadian company TransCanada. The extension would transport 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day,1 which is about double the United State’s current imports of dirty tar sands.2 The extension would run from Alberta, Canada to Nebraska, where it would connect with an existing pipeline to transport the oil to refineries along the Gulf Coast of Texas. The project is expected to cost about $8 billion dollars.3 Before the TransCanada pipeline extensionRead More Solar Energy Essay1618 Words   |  7 Pages~Some history, types, and facts~ In this modern fast paced world that we live in, there are many issues that are looked over, energy is one of these. As a world, we are dependant on dwindling fossil fuel supplies and take for granted electricity, oil, and gas. There are four completely renewable sources of energy around us that should be used and developed, they are: wind, growing plants, flowing water, and the sun. These sources of energy are the ones we should be tapping, because they are reliableRead MoreThe World Is An Ever Changing Place1229 Words   |  5 Pagesever changing place, moving at a punishing pace. This perpetual motion requires a constant source of energy. This energy comes in the form of oil and petroleum products, products that invigorate both our cars and America’s foreign and domestic policy. Oil is king. It rules everyday life, national policy, and the fates, even the lives, of millions of people. Oil is power in the form of black liquid in a barrel. However, America does not, at t he moment, have the ability to control this valuable resourceRead MoreOur Dangerous Dependence on Fossil Fuels Essay703 Words   |  3 Pagesthat they have. The U.S. depends on countries like Sadie Arabia for our oil supplies. How would we be affected if Sadie Arabia refused to sell us their oil? Would our oil reserves run out or would we be able to buy from another country? These are scenarios that we need to be concerned about. According to Rebecca Lefton and Daniel J. Weiss in their article â€Å"Oil Dependence Is a Dangerous Habit†, the U.S. has increased import of oil in the recent years, creating a bigger deficit in the United States.Read MoreGovernment Should Not Prop Up Electric And Hybrid Vehicles1255 Words   |  6 Pagescars on American roads by 2015 and this goal was supported with $5 billion in taxpayer dollars. As taxpayers, we have plenty of reasons to be concerned about this lavish subsidies. Should we spend a lot of taxpayer’s money to subsidy elect ric or hybrid vehicles? The administration and Congress have given voters many good grounds for these lavish subsidies, including saving money for gas, reducing oil consumption and gaining the environmental benefits, securing threat posed by our dependence on foreignRead MoreEssay on Renewable Energy: The Switch is Now1504 Words   |  7 PagesThe year is 2200. The world is going through a fossil fuel shortage. Oil reserves are almost completely consumed and it is becoming impossible to find new fossil fuel sources. Not prepared for this event to occur, The United States, has no alternative options. As a result of the oil shortage, the standard of living deteriorates. Heat in homes, supermarkets full of food, and transportation, all basic necessities taken for granted, will be depleted because fossil fuels are used to power almost everythingRead MoreCan We Americans Switch From Non Renewable Diesel Fuel1573 Words   |  7 PagesCan we Americans switch from non-renewable diesel fue l, to renewable biodiesel? I believe this switch is vital to our future. With gasoline prices volatile and the Obama administration committed to easing the United States addiction to oil, many Americans seem to be taking more interest in pursuing alternative fuels. These alternative fuels include those derived from farm crops and other renewable organic sources. Among the most widely available are biodiesel and vegetable oil, both of which can

Saturday, December 21, 2019

Movie Analysis of Jaws. - 2238 Words

Released in 1975, Jaws was probably one of the best adventure, action, and suspense films of that era. Directed by Steven Spielberg with the following staring main cast members Roy Scheider as Martin Bordy (chief police officer), Richard Dreyfuss as Matt Hooper (marine biologist), Robert Shaw as Quint (local fisherman), Murray Hamilton as Larry Vaughan (town mayor). Jaws the movie, is not like any other any other fish story. The film is about a gigantic 26 foot shark that has an appetite for people; how horrifying is that? The unusual story takes place on the seasides of Amity Island. When Chief Brody uncovers the partial body of a teenage girl with shark like bites, Chief Brody contacts a shark specialist to verify if the bite†¦show more content†¦His acts of heroism are acted out several times throughout the film. Of course, he also had his boat captain and a marine biologist along for the wild ride. This plays out to be a team-like environment, in which they contributed t heir different individual strengths towards the common goal; hunting down the massive man-eating shark. This film also used countless props; however, there is truly only one that needs to be discussed, and goes by the name of Jaws. This massive great-white shark was a 26 foot mechanical beast. This enormous steel gutted fish was connected to a crane arm which allowed the shark to tread just underneath the surface of the water at a rapid rate. This gives the realistic feel of the amount of power this shark has; being able to swim at such rates of speed. This adds to the fright element of movie because we all know that big animals can be intimidating. Animals that are big and fast are even scarier. Animals that are big, fast, and hungry, are a force to be reckoned with. The film, Jaws, uses a variety of different photographic techniques. Panning was used quite often in this movie to remind the viewer that they were a long distance from the shoreline. Additionally, plenty of filming was done underwater. This allowed the audience to get a realistic feel for the surrounding environment. The brilliant underwater imagery resulted with help from the naturally dark and chilling emptiness of the foreign ocean world. A notable climatic shot isShow MoreRelatedMovie Analysis of Jaws Essay896 Words   |  4 PagesMovie Analysis of Jaws Martin Brody is the new police chief trying to rid Amity Island of a savage shark terrorising the islanders and tourists alike in the 1976 thriller, Jaws. Jaws was directed by Steven Spielberg and starred Roy Scheider, Robert Shaw and Richard Dreyfuss. Amity Island relies almost fully on the income gained by tourists visiting the island in the summer vacation. It is up to Martin Brody to protect the beach goers by finding the shark and killingRead MoreMovie Analysis : Jaws 2116 Words   |  9 Pageshorror movies â€Å"Jaws, â€Å"The Others†, â€Å"Signs† and â€Å"Frankenstein† but today we are just focusing on these three movies: â€Å"Jaws†, â€Å"The Others† and â€Å"Signs†. â€Å"Frankenstein† was just a flat out boring movie because it was a movie that was black and white and it showed portrayed nothing about how it made the movie suspenseful and scary. â€Å"Jaws† was a movie that was made in 1975 which had nothing to scare people of this generation but at least they used appropriate techniques to make the movie suspenseful. â€Å"TheRead MoreMovie Analysis : The Film Jaws 1483 Words   |  6 Pagesthe classic summer blockbuster Jaws, your heart immediately picks up and instantly visions of a massive, man eating shark pop into your head. In 1975, Jaws terrified beachgoers everywhere with the bone chilling thought of a vicious great white shark lurking just below their feet, threatening to attack every person it came in contact with. Swimmers were haunted by the image of the film’s poster, which displayed a swimmer just within reach of the colossal beast’s jaws. The poster did its job in conveyingRead MorePlot Of The Film The Night On Amity Island 1689 Words   |  7 Pagesbeach as a son to Brody narrowly escapes attack. Quint promises to kill the animal for $15,000. The mayor finally admits there is a problem and hires him for the job. Technical Composition of the Movie Gottlieb Benchley (2010) point out that â€Å"Jaws† was directed by Steven Spielberg. Starring in the movie included Craig Kingsbury, Jeffrey Voorhees, Lee Fierro, Jay Mello, Chris Robello, Ted Grossman, Jonathan Filley, Susan Backlinie, Jeffrey Kramer, Carl Gottlieb, Murray Hamilton, Lorraine Gary, RichardRead MoreAnalysis Of Film The Filmmaking World1197 Words   |  5 PagesDirector Comparative Analysis In the filmmaking world, the different uses of cinematography are endless. In many cases, a director’s editing techniques and narrative are so distinct that one might differentiate the film’s director just by examining its cinematic language. For example, Steven Spielberg uses signature works in many of his films that allow viewers to categorize them as his own. Spielberg, a famous Hollywood style director, was born in Ohio. He kicked off his Hollywood career afterRead MoreEssay about A Dangerous Method989 Words   |  4 Pages(Institutional Affiliation) (Date) This paper looks at the movie; A Dangerous Method directed by David Cronenberge is based on true life events that happened on the eve of the World War 1. This movie brings out the theories, techniques, and the central characters in the early history of psychoanalysis. It brings out the effectiveness of psychoanalysis method and shows the risks and dangers encountered when entering the unconscious mind. This movie takes a look at these through the life of Carl Jung whoRead MoreLiterary Analysis : The Left Side Journal Essay1062 Words   |  5 PagesChapters 13-14 Left Side Journal With these chapters, I struggled doing my literary analysis because there was not much I could relate to except for the fact that he sometimes felt â€Å"yellow† in which I thought it meant being somewhat of a coward. I just focused on the fact that Holden ordered a prostitute, but he didn’t want to do anything with her and only talk. I focused on this because it was interesting to see how he changes character-wise. I saw him as only a perverted, immature guy, but heRead MoreFilm Critique of All the Presidents Men1541 Words   |  7 PagesAmerican journalism yet at the same time is a suspenseful adventure that manages to entertain and inform its viewers. Vincent Canby, a reviewer for the New York Times called the movie, an unequivocal smash-hitÂâ€"the thinking mans Jaws. Because the film is written from the perspective of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, the movie works as a blockbuster, and not just a documentary. The script was written in such a way that the h istorical information (dates, names, and events) is recorded, but does notRead MoreSteven Spielberg : Postmodern Auteur And Constructor1812 Words   |  8 Pagesunderstand Spielberg’s auteur style, it’s first crucial to salute the blockbuster that positioned Spielberg to keep making films: Jaws (1975). It’s important to clarify that Jaws is a mediocre representation of Spielberg’s style. In a 1977 interview with Richard Combs, Spielberg admits, â€Å"Sometimes I’ll forfeit style for content. That’s why I feel that Jaws does not have a style. Jaws is all content, experiment† (36). Spielberg reflects â€Å"mixed feelings† over the film. Spielberg didn’t write the film, as itRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie The Raiders Of The Lost Ark 1605 Words   |  7 PagesJones is a movie that came out in 1981, George Lucas, wanted to create a character that inspire young generations to go in adventures and homage heroes. He knew that a great movie need a well-known composer, John Williams became one of the most popular orchestral composer in America. He had won three Golden Globes awards, five Academy Awards, 17 Grammys and five BAFTA awards from Television Arts. One of the most famous movements that he composed for important movies are for, Jurassic Park, Jaws, E.T,

Thursday, December 12, 2019

The Hoover Stimson Doctrine free essay sample

Analysis of the Historical Review: The Hoover Stemson Doctrine BY Pontifications Analysis of the Historical Review by Richard N. Current: The Hoover Stemson Doctrine Rick]. Goldberg American Diplomatic History II Professor Has Resubmission In the year 1931, Japanese movement in north eastern China became of great concern to the Hoover administration. The policy of non-recognition the U. S. Adopted regarding Japanese activity during the Manchuria Crisis would come to be known as the Hoover-Stemson Doctrine. The doctrine was named after the U. S. President and Secretary to State at the time, whose tortes to create an intensive yet stern policy to reinforce the Nine Power Treaty and the Kellogg-Brand (Pact of Paris) were the basis of the non-recognition policy, or the Hoover-Stemson Doctrine. The policy of non- recognition toward the actions committed by the Japanese army in China was one that both Hoover and Stemson supported. However, as illustrated in the historical review of the policy written by Richard Current, their conclusion to follow through with the said policy was reached on two differentiating perspectives. The Hoover-Stemson Doctrine At the outset of the Manchuria Crisis of 1931-1933, Secretary of State Henry L. Stemson had shown some concern, but not nearly as much as the League of Nations. Stemson did not wish to estrange Japan, nor did he approve of any conduct that would strengthen the Japanese military element. When Japanese expansion to Chinch occurred, the neutrality policy was then quickly replaced by an urgency to create a new and effective policy. However, the secretary chose to wait for action to be taken by the League and simply have their consultant in Geneva meet with the League to act as a representative of the United States. However, Stemson worked to create a distance between American diplomatic policies from that of the League and delay his endorsement of their policies to Japan, as well as discreetly applying any alterations to the policy to fit U. S. Concern. The precautions taken by Stemson were not far from any policy Hoover saw fit; both men were in agreement toward each others policy. Yet President Hoover was not as willing as Stemson to take it as far as Stemson himself seemed to favor. Eventually it became evident that Tokyo was no longer in total control of the Japanese military in China and the situation was in the hands of virtually mad dogs. [l] Under immense pressure, debate amongst the cabinet to participate with the League in economic sanctions against Japan had become the primary concern. The administration eventually reached the conclusion that they would not participate with the League, but would not stop them either. Stemson argued that an embargo meant war, and informed the ambassador to Britain the U. S. Would therefore, not take part in any sanctions. Hoover felt that the U. S. policy was now going very far, hill Stemson was still rather vigilant and willing to keep going. Stemson now began fluctuating on the idea of imposing brief sanctions and keeping on with his current hand. Eventually, President Hoover came up with the non-recognition policy. Stemson immediately brought this up to his staff who for the most part, concurred. Though delayed at first, Japanese movement upon Chinch hastened Stemson to act and write a note on January 7th of 1932 proclaiming non-recognition of Chinese hegemony in Manchuria. It was cleverly formatted to be as inoffensive as possible and there was no objection from any relative U. S. policy makers. Upon Japanese activities in Shanghai 13 days following the note, Stemson was prompted to endorse the U. S. Ana to reinforce the Asiatic squadron, particularly in Hawaii and the Philippines. Though this was initially met with some controversy, his start eventually supported it, and Hoover was rather enthusiastic toward it trot the start. Hovers purpose, which was in tutelage of American lives and property, was not that of Stemsons. Stemson, though indeed in concurrence with Hoover, did not wish to pose a threat to Japan but, simply to make a statement. However, Hoover ecocide to pacify Shanghai with mediation efforts involving England, France, and Italy and endorse a non-violent policy. Stemson was frustrated at this act, as Hoover had called his own secretary bluff. In seeking an alternative, Stemson issued a note to Senator Boras suggesting a reissue of the January 7th 1932 note Stemson sent to Japan reaffirming the same policy but, with more vigor and a new threat. This was to use the Nine Power Treaty (which endorsed the Open Door Policy in China) as a bargaining chip with the Washington conference treaties. If Japan continued to show belligerence toward Chinese integrity, the U. S. Would no longer abide by the naval restrictions constituted by the Washington conference treaties. President Hoover wished to propose an additional statement threatening a moral sanction on the Japanese in the note but, Stemson wished to keep Japan wondering in the dark. Though Hoover desired to proclaim to the public that the U. S. Had no intention of war, Stemson published the note without that addition, and he informed Hoover that such a statement would appear the two men were in disagreement. Though this letter (Boras letter) had no mention of imposing economic sanctions, Stemsons envisage of that such threats eventual use and the implementation of the Washington treaties as somewhat of a bargaining chip portrayed his willingness to compete in a naval race in the Pacific. In April, Hoover then sent Stemson to Europe to discuss the far eastern crisis in councils. It was then that Hoover, with the help of Undersecretary of State Castle, endeavored to claim the non-recognition policy as his own to be used as a boost in the presidential campaign. Hoover then wanted Stemson to proclaim said policy as the Hoover Doctrine; Stemson declined this request on the rounds that he had already issued the same such policy in the January 7th note and the Boras Letter. 111 Hoover also sought military disarmament. Stemson condemned such an act as detrimental to the necessity of keeping the U. S. Naval force intact in the Pacific to keep the Japanese at bay. However, Hoover, through speeches made by Castle, assured the public that the use of economic sanctions and/or military force was not going to take place, ignoring Stemsons pleas. Meanwhile Stemson was in Europe to rally the League of Nations behind the non-recognition policy. Hoover also oppressed the part of Stemsons speech that the secretary had written himself on the Kellogg-Brand as well as expressing a willingness to Join on imposing sanctions when he presented his draft. Thus the administration had presented a basis and support for the non-recognition policy. The speech was presented before the Council of Foreign Relations, finalizing the policy indefinitely. However, Stemson was in disapproval toward Hovers assurance of refraining from war to the public and suppression of the last three pages of his speech. The reporting of the Layton Commission of the League of Nations condemned Japan as using the army not in any form of self-defense, in violation of Kellogg- Brand, as well as including implications on China and the Soviet Union. Stemson was pleased Witt the Layton Report. However to his dismay yet again, the rest to the cabinet as well as the president were apathetic. It was argued that the notes of non- recognition and the Layton Report cannot coincide because the Layton Report suggested a new Chinese regime over the old one or a Japanese one. Stemson however did not concur. After Franklin D. Roosevelt victory in the 1932 presidential election, Stemson took it upon himself to undertake the task of acting on the two policies together. With Hovers skeptic approval, Stemson accepted an invitation from Roosevelt to meet on the subject of foreign affairs. He and Roosevelt were in complete agreement, and on the Manchuria Crisis, Roosevelt had limited knowledge of the subject and in turn had no quarrel supporting Stemson. Now at last Stemson was in a position to act without accordance from the suppressive administration and the League of Nations due to Roosevelt aid, Stemson successfully arranged through overall subsequent political endeavors to allow the adoption by the League and the U. S. The non-recognition policy and the Layton Report together. This led to Japaneses resignation from the League as they felt that the Layton Report along with the U. S. Non-recognition policy were both anti-Japanese. They also saw the League as powerless on the grounds that it had censured Japanese aggression, but never took effective action. A satisfactory alternative to economic and military pressure, the policy endorsed by the non-recognition policy or the Hoover-Stemson Doctrine, seems somewhat introductory in name. Hoover and Stemson, though sharing a common goal, had different intentions behind said goal.